UK will consider joining US-led military coalition in Gulf: PM Johnson

UK believes Iran was behind Saudi Aramco oil attacks, says Boris Johnson


Reuters September 23, 2019
PHOTO: AFP

NEW YORK: Britain believes Iran was responsible for an attack on Saudi oil facilities and will work with the United States and European allies on a joint response, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Monday.

The United States and Saudi Arabia have already blamed Iran for the September 14 strikes that initially halved Saudi oil output. Yemen’s Houthi movement has claimed responsibility.

“The UK is attributing responsibility with a very high degree of probability to Iran for the Aramco attacks. We think it very likely indeed that Iran was indeed responsible,” Johnson told reporters on the plane to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.

UK PM hopeful Boris Johnson called French 'turds': report

“We will be working with our American friends and our European friends to construct a response that tries to deescalate tensions in the Gulf region.”

A UK government official said the Houti’s claim of responsibility was “implausible”, with the scale, sophistication and range of the attack inconsistent with their capabilities.

“It is implausible it wouldn’t have been authorised by the Iranian government,” the official said.

Asked whether Britain would rule out military action, Johnson said it would be closely watching a proposal by the United States to do more to help defend Saudi Arabia.

'Going to waste': UK shipyard braces for Brexit turmoil

“Clearly if we are asked, either by the Saudis or by the Americans, to have a role then we will consider in what way we could be useful,” he said.

Johnson said he would be discussing Iran’s actions in the region with President Hassan Rouhani at the UN meeting, as well as pushing for the release of several dual national Iranians who he said were being held “illegally and unfairly”.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ