China, US to hold next round of trade talks in late August

It is unclear if it will take place before or after Aug 23, when US will activate tariffs on $16B of Chinese goods


Reuters August 16, 2018
Containers are seen at the Yangshan Deep Water Port in Shanghai, China April 24, 2018. PHOTO: REUTERS

BEIJING: China said on Thursday it will hold a fresh round of trade talks with the United States in Washington later this month, offering a glimmer of hope for progress in resolving a conflict that has set world markets on edge.

A Chinese delegation led by Vice Minister of Commerce Wang Shouwen will meet with US representatives led by Under Secretary of Treasury for International Affairs David Malpass, the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on its website.

US denies China policy change after Taiwan leader speech in LA

The world’s two largest economies have implemented several rounds of tit-for-tat tariffs on each others goods since the start of the year and have threatened further tariffs on exports worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

The announcement of the forthcoming meeting comes after a lull in talks between the two sides, but it is unclear whether it will take place before or after Aug.23, when Washington is due to activate additional tariffs on $16 billion of Chinese goods. Beijing has said it will retaliate in kind.

The last official round of talks was in early June when US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross met Chinese Vice Premier Liu He in Beijing.

There was no immediate response from the US Treasury to the announcement from Beijing.

The upcoming meeting is lower-level compared with four previous rounds of talks that involved Liu, Ross and US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.

Having made little progress in the previous meetings, the White House said on August 3 that the United States is open to further talks with China on how to resolve the festering trade dispute.

China has repeatedly pointed out that US companies and consumers will be hard hit by the trade war, a theme the ruling Communist Party’s official People’s Daily returned to on Thursday.

US President Donald Trump’s “America First” slogan had caused only economic trouble for the country, the paper said, pointing to examples like losses incurred by US soybean farmers amid the trade war.

“What’s fantastical is that US trade policy-makers seem to be totally deaf. The voices of producers, the international community and expert groups have been pouring forth, but they’re turning a deaf ear to them,” it said in a commentary.

The news of the upcoming talks helped Chinese stocks pare losses, with the Shanghai Composite Index and Hong Kong's Hang Seng index both down 0.4 percent, having fallen as much as 1.9 percent and 1.7 percent, respectively, in early trading on Thursday.

US futures also gained, as Dow e-minis .1YMc1 rose as much as 0.5 percent on the news, though they later trimmed some of those gains.

The offshore Chinese yuan rose briefly against the dollar, strengthening to a high of 6.9165 before wilting.

Easing trade tensions helped lift Chinese copper futures SCFcv1 off 14-month lows, while prices of Chinese farm goods fell amid hopes that supplies of US soybeans, used to make cooking oil and animal feed, may resume if disputes are resolved.

The United States and China implemented tariffs on $34 billion of each other’s exports on July 6 and barring some breakthrough another tit-for-tat exchange is likely when Washington imposes additional tariffs on $16 billion of Chinese goods next week.

Trump signs defense policy bill with watered-down China measures

Separately, China has said it is prepared to put additional tariffs on 5,207 goods imported from the United States with a total value of $60 billion, ranging from liquefied natural gas to some aircraft.

The move was in response to a threat from Washington to increase tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods to 25 percent from 10 percent.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ