Sunny
High: 34°C
Low: 28°C
Alerts
 
< >

SC rejects government objections on full court bench

Published: May 31, 2010

The Supreme Court will resume hearing the petitions against the 18th amendment on Monday.

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) has rejected the objections raised by the federal government in the 18th amendment case on Monday.

During the court proceedings today, the government’s representative Abdul Basit said that the chief justice, who is included in the judicial commission for the judges’ appointment, should not be hearing the case.

He objected to the formation of the full court bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry.

The court issued a show-cause notice to Dr Abdul Basit.

Fifteen constitutional petitions were filed against some clauses of the amendment particularly challenging the judicial commission’s formation under the 18th amendment saying it is against the judiciary’s independence.

Later, in a telephonic message sent to the larger bench through the Supreme Courts registrar, Salman Farooqi said that he had nothing to do with the two objections.

The principal secretary of president said that he would send a written statement before the court. In an aftermath, Dr Basit confessed infront of the court that he committeed a professional misconduct by disclosing the name of Salman Farooqi.

On the last hearing on May 24, the bench directed the lawyers for the federation to file a concise statement in response to the petitions.

The court had also directed Attorney General Moulvi Anwarul Haq to place proceedings of the Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional Reforms before the court.

Reader Comments (3)

  • May 31, 2010 - 5:03PM

    There are daily playing judge judge and lawyer lawyer . Both gov and court are fighting for their power . I think justice party is wasting our time . our three golden year were waste by court . they are just putting pressure on gov. they are giving threats to lawyer and officer . Doger was best judge at least he strength the democracy . today our big problem is terrorism it is shame on us not a single terrorist was punish . no police officer were ready to take duty in Lahore because of tow shraif ‘s attitude . our interior minister of on the hit list of court instead of terrorist . posting and promotion is no more authority of PM . Minister and securities are planning how can they safe from court . no one thinking about people and state . “ Raisat hyo gi sotaly maa jaseRecommend

  • Shahzad Khan
    May 31, 2010 - 5:39PM

    @Pervaiz
    I agree with you. Well said. A country run by 17 Judges.Recommend

  • Shahid
    May 31, 2010 - 6:24PM

    Just two observations about supreme court:

    1- If indeed it stands for the rule of law, it should prove that by taking suo motu action to bring General Musharraf to justice. Then we will be convinced that the judges are not afraid of army;

    2- It should justify to us the legetimacy that it has conferred on successive military dictatorships, including on general Musharraf, and justice Iftekhar Chaudhry was part of that.Recommend

More in Pakistan

X