Sunny
High: 35°C
Low: 28°C
Alerts
 
< >

Understanding Faisal Shahzad

Published: May 26, 2010

The writer is the Reagan Fascell Fellow at the National Endowment for Democracy in Washington DC (zahid.ebrahim@tribune.com.pk)

After activating the bomb in Times Square that fateful evening, Faisal Shahzad could have gone straight to JFK Airport. He would have been in Waziristan by Monday morning with a few hours to spare before his name would be added to the no-fly list. Instead he went home and turned on the TV. The headline news was unexpected. The bomb was a flop. The only explosion on TV was the police robot blasting its way to the gun locker in which Shahzad had assembled the bomb.

The realisation that he was more a goof than a dangerous extremist was difficult to swallow. Shahzad decided to make a run for it. At 630 pm the same evening he called Emirates to buy a one-way ticket on flight EK 202. His dramatic last minute arrest is now history.

Shahzad is not the usual suspect. His father is a respected retired air vice-marshal. An MBA from the University of Bridgeport in Connecticut, he was not a regular at any of the local mosques where Fox TV could lay the blame. He was not fired by his US employer, but chose to quit his job as a financial analyst. His wife attended the University of Colorado and does not fit the hijab-wearing stereotype.

Shahzad leaves us flabbergasted at how an ordinary kid from a liberal family graduated to a bomber. The trite answer: radicalised by bloodshed in Iraq and Afghanistan or the drone attacks in Fata is no longer adequate. To understand Shahzad’s world, try looking through the lens presented by journalists Jamie Bartlett and Richard Reeves. In an article published earlier this year they argued that “The battle against home grown terrorism is not principally an ideological or religious one. Young Muslims are drawn, like young people throughout the ages, to excitement, rebellion and a desire to be ‘cool’.”

Look again at Shahzad’s pictures: the designer sunglasses, the fashionably trimmed beard, the smirk for the camera, and it is difficult to miss the urge of a young man cultivating the “I am so cool” image. Shahzad loved to shop at Macys and was a fan of “Everybody loves Raymond”. He fits well into the profile of a new face of American home grown terror: “raised on a diet of traditional Islam and western popular culture he was attracted to the glamour and excitement that al Qaeda purported to offer.”

Bartlett and Reeves’ prescription: “First, demystify terrorist lives and deaths. The life of a terrorist is that of a criminal, tedious, lonely and punctuated by fear. Terrorist incompetence must be highlighted.” Shahzad may be the ideal candidate for such an effort. He left the car keys of his getaway vehicle and a cell phone in the smoking Nissan Pathfinder.

Second, “expose the al Qaeda ideology as thin and unable to withstand criticism. Instead of being afraid, let them circulate freely. Young people will be drawn to them regardless; better that it is left in the open. Young Muslims who turn to violence tend to be less well read than those who remain peaceful. Liberal values of free speech and dissent are central to the destruction of the al Qaeda brand”.

Lastly, “welcome non-violent forms of radicalism. Participation in demonstrations is much higher among the non-violent.” A radical is not the same as a terrorist. Yet in mainstream America young Pakistani Americans are afraid to publicly speak their mind for fear of being ostracised. A young Pakistani American doctor from Houston politely refused my farewell present on his visit to Karachi fearing harassment from US customs. The unwelcome present was a book titled The Reluctant Fundamentalist by Mohsin Hamid.

The fight against home grown terror may yield better results if mainstream America makes an effort to embrace young Muslims instead of fearing them. The fact that even after nine years in the US, Shahzad could claim not one white American as a friend is not only a vivid example of his failure to enter the melting pot but also a sad commentary on American society.

Published in the Express Tribune, May 27th, 2010.

Reader Comments (8)

  • May 26, 2010 - 11:49PM

    @Zahid: excellent and sane argument. The only problem is that how can it be implemented in Pakistan when part of the state wants to keep matters this way?Recommend

  • May 27, 2010 - 2:39AM

    Sadly, too many sections of the state and society have too much to gain from senseless violence to seriously dwell on de-radicalisation. The politicians and the military will loose an important bargaining chip with the West if suddenly peace was restored. The Mullah’s will loose their influence as they are either seen resorting to street protests based on hate rather than hope or offering to act as innoculators between the Taliban and the state. Our Middle Eastern brothers, while demanding strict obedience to the state from their own citizens have no qualms about propagating their sectarian ideology abroad, making Pakistan their battleground. And the list go’s on. There is little incentive to demystify terrorists. They seem to be the only heroes for so many.Recommend

  • Rashid Saleem
    May 27, 2010 - 12:43PM

    Radicalization needs not to be aggressively injected. Interestingly, it can be injected into your thought process as ‘slow poisoning’ and this is what happened to Faisal Shahzad. I think at the end he just picked up his poison and now a lot of others will pay the price along with him.Recommend

  • May 27, 2010 - 1:41PM

    Zahid, I agree with the respondents. How do you fight the vested interests who thrive on the global industry that is terrorism and on keeping the muslim communities isolated from the larger community. Take India for instance, I am an admirer of the Indian Muslim community – they (and the Christians, Parsis, Sikhs etc) have done every minority community in the world proud by working against odds to achieve what they have achieved. I agree with you about the failiures of the majority community in not being more welcoming. And to make matters worse, you have the fascist elements in the majority culture that will play up the fears of the silent majority. As if this was not enough, you have the deobandis who will issue fatwas that restrict Muslim men and women from working in fields such as banking.Recommend

  • Ammar Zafarullah
    May 27, 2010 - 4:40PM

    Zahid! While faisel may not have any white friends but then Faisal was a neutralized American, I know many born Americans of Pakistani origin who are constrained in their own circles, there social intermingling is limited to weekly gatherings at the Islamic center. So more than the society the Pakistani living in U.S view it as a land of opportunities yet an evil society which is ought to corrupt their children. The radical perceptions in the society need to be addressed and the community needs to engage with other races.Recommend

  • Zahid
    May 28, 2010 - 12:07AM

    Appreciate the comments. I may point out that the concluding paragraph, which could not be accomodated due to space restrictions, was as follows: “Yes it was an American Vietnam Vet, Lance Norton who alerted the NYPD about Shahzad’s smoking SUV. However, it was street vendor, Aliou Niasse, a Muslim man from Senegal, who alerted Norton to seek Police attention in the first place. The headline which did not happen, NY Terror Bomb Foiled by Muslim Immigrant, might well have been the most potent weapon in the fight against home grown terror in the West.”Recommend

  • Khayam
    May 28, 2010 - 12:23PM

    Great write up ZE. I can imagine Hollywood clamouring for the rights to the movie. Shehzad was a failure from the start. He attended a no-name undergrad school where he earned Ds and Fs. In my opinion, he must have been motivated by someone he met in N.Waziristan to seek his own demented version of “glory.” Fortunately for all, the saving grace was his failure again!Recommend

  • Muhammad Salman Afzal
    Jun 3, 2010 - 4:33PM

    Well, you people have done a big job. i solute you. but ,as you say media is free, what are you doing, freedom does’nt mean that you have all the rights . you must abide by the rules of media. this is a general comment not for faisal shazad.
    salam.Recommend

More in Opinion

X