Fauzia Wahab accused of blasphemy

Hazrat Umar was the second Caliph,, third was hazrat Usman.. Please correct it…Recommend

Justice Lawyers Group should not be so ‘loose’ with the concept of blashfamy that even a comparison of, somebody with some body, may make one blashfamous.
I would have prefered to accuse Fauzia Wahab for flattery,which may not be a cognizable offence but definitely not a good thing and doesn’t suit a person like her.Moreover, to flatter Mr.Zardari may be her personal affair but to flatter the President amounts to rediculing him, which, I am sure, she didn’t intend to.Recommend

You r welcome :))Recommend

Can’t believe people here defending her!!!!!!Recommend

She has issued an objectionable statement which definitely needs to be condemned but probably she could not phrase her statement correctly and point out the controversy existing in our system.

We are hanging in between Islamic Shariat and Constitution and take advantage of any thing and whenever it suits the politicians, which is totally incorrect, ethically, morally and as per Islamic teachings.

In fact we should be “Islamic” & “Democratic” as per our name but unfortunately we are neither. None of our rules should be against the Islamic teachings / Shariah but the dilema is that our constitution has been prepared by the people who were oriented towards their personal gains and wanted to have legal protections, whereas Islam lays down very strict restrictions on the rulers who in fact are supposed to be demonstrating personal example of high moralities and character traits.

Ruling is more of a responsibility than enjoying the benefits of that particular appointment at what ever level it is.

As a matter of fact custodian of a “Chair of Responsibility” whether he is President or at the lowest level of governmental authority is never exempted or given “Immunity” rather he is charged & punished for two offences if he commits any as compared to a normal citizen who commits the same offence. One for the offence itself and secondly he is liable to punitive actions for “Breach of Trust bestowed upon him”

Therefore if we are Islamic, Democratic country, our constitution needs to be corrected and this is where the Supreme Court and the “Islamic Nazriati Counsil” should have come into play but unfortunately none of them is performing their duties. They all are oriented towards personal securities and gains.Recommend

It is high time she was accused of something that would make her a bit more careful about how she speaks and what she says. She has an unfortunate set of public speaking skills, which is surprising considering her role. Maybe this will make her think before she speaks?Recommend

Fauzia wahab has no basic knowledge of islam,if she had she does not say her false statement.She said pakistan costitution is sperior than HOLY QURAN ,I think she does not read(recite) HOLY QURAN ever in her life.She should forgive from ALLAH for her wrong statement.Recommend

Dear Fauzia Wahab, Kindly Teach us how boil an egg ……. The Ministers of Pakistan are Good for nothing.Recommend

she is mad woman she did not think that what she is saying she forgave her sinRecommend

Whatever Fauzia Wahab has said is completely justified, a bunch of religious fanatics have totally blown her statement out of proportion and now issuing statements to come into limelight.

Nobody actually knows what exactly did she say but since she’s from PPP, she ll be targeted!Recommend

@ Rauf,

Why you guys conveniently forget that it was Aitezaz and other opposition leaders who first dragged Hazrat Umar RA into this issue and issued statements on media that if Hazrat Umar RA could present himself for accountability why not Zardari.

Fauzia Wahab has just responded to those statements.Recommend

@ Danish.. At the time of Hazrat Omer R.A, Hazrat Usman R.A, Hazrat Abu Bakar R.A and Hazrat Ali R.A, the the Qazi or mufti, equaled the chief justice/justice of today. At that time the Qazi/mufti had full authority to call in court anyone whom he considered guilty; be it the Caliph of the time.
If our constitution says our President has immunity against all cases filed against him, means that its against the Islamic teachings.Recommend