Alerts
 
< >

Pakistan ready to discuss Most Favoured Nation status for India

Published: April 26, 2011

Trade maximisation, removal of non-tariff barriers to be taken up during talks.

ISLAMABAD: 

In a significant shift in policy, Pakistan is willing to discuss granting India Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status when the two countries resume trade talks that stopped after 2008 Mumbai attacks.

Indian Commerce Secretary Rahul Khullar, leading a six-member delegation, will arrive on Tuesday to hold talks on trade-related issues. This will be the second high-level interaction between the two countries that have seen many ups and downs in their fragile relationship, largely driven by political maneuvering. In February, commerce secretaries of both countries held talks on the sidelines of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) meetings.

The talks will continue for two days and cover various issues with an aim to boost trade between the neighbouring countries, as the potential is being wasted. In recent times, India has accused Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism, while Pakistan has complained of Indian intervention in the restive areas of Balochistan. The establishment is also keen to find a solution to the Kashmir dispute before exploring full trade potential.

Sources said Pakistan has conveyed to India through diplomatic channels and friendly nations that it would discuss the issue of giving MFN status to Delhi. However, the MFN status is not linked with the European Union (EU) trade concessions, which the 27-nation bloc offered to Pakistan in the wake of last year’s floods, but could not go through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) due to Indian and other countries’ opposition.

EU offered a time-bound tariff concession on 75 product lines, however, after opposition from India, Bangladesh and Vietnam, the matter has been referred to the WTO General Council, which is scheduled to meet in the first week of May.

“The EU concessions are not quid pro quo with the MFN status, which is a bilateral issue,” said a source. India granted the status to Pakistan in 1996 and has since been seeking a reciprocal response. However, on every occasion that the Indians raised the issue, Pakistani authorities politely turned it down. Pakistan regulates trade with India though a positive list, which allows only listed items to be imported from the country.

Speaking to The Express Tribune, Secretary Commerce Zafar Mahmood said, “The objective of the talks is trade liberalisation, ensuring a level-playing field for Pakistani exporters.” He said Pakistan would like to build on the progress made in the four rounds of trade talks before the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

“Pakistan is ready to discuss anything under the sun but all stakeholders will be taken into confidence before reaching a conclusion,” he added.

The Indian government blamed Pakistan for the November 26, 2008 attacks in which 166 people were killed, causing a breakdown in trade relations.

Pakistan will also take up the issue of non-tariff barriers on its exports that have been largely affecting cement and textile exports to India. India is infamous for erecting non-tariff barriers to protect its industry from competitors. Though it imports cement from Pakistan, it has imposed state-specific restrictions.

On textile products, Indian Customs officials decide which product can enter the border and determine duty rates. Pakistan is also keen to increase export of food items but India has imposed health-related non-tariff barriers.

Published in The Express Tribune, April 26th, 2011.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (8)

  • Hedgefunder
    Apr 26, 2011 - 3:23PM

    This is a non starter !!! There are too many issues to be resolved and discussed, prior to any such consideration !!!
    Furthermore Pakistan needs to obtain an LOC from IMF, so that the trade bodies know that they are likely to be paid for any such transactions and are bankable!!!!!!
    Lastly the level of trade possible with pakistan is really very insignificant amount for India to want to go thru with this arrangement at present without resolving other outstanding issues with Pakistan!!!!
    lastly, India really do not need this so called favoured nation business, this is offered by pakistan!!! so to those who reply please read the article properly and then comment.Recommend

  • John
    Apr 26, 2011 - 5:11PM

    Bilateral trade is prosperous only if both parties are on similar rule.

    With nearly 16 years of MFN status that PAK enjoyed with India, did it reap the benefit?

    Without similar agreements on both sides, PAK will be exporting whatever the Indians wanted, in exchange for money, and will be working hard to please the masters, not competing with masters.

    One way gate of export always made the export country as a servant for import country. Recommend

  • M. Tauseef Barlas
    Apr 26, 2011 - 5:29PM

    let’s see india removes restriction on our items. Recommend

  • Cautious
    Apr 26, 2011 - 6:06PM

    Who wants to trade with a country who’s government is complicit in terrorism? Why would India want to do business with Pakistan?Recommend

  • Meekal Ahmed
    Apr 26, 2011 - 7:24PM

    Because of economies of scale and low unit wage costs, Indian products could bury Pakistani manufacturing industry. This has to be handled with care and will require looking at relative cost structures product-by-product. The TDAP should have this information and possibly studies as well.

    But trade is good. Our manufacturing industry needs to be exposed to the sharp winds of global competition, including from next door. Recommend

  • John
    Apr 26, 2011 - 8:33PM

    @Hedgefunder:
    Dear friend, in my view trade will make all other sticky issues as irrelevant. Pak cannot enjoy MFN with India without reciprocating it at some point.

    Unless pak grants MFN to India, there is no movement of PAK goods across India and further into Bhutan, Nepal, Mayanmar, or Bangladesh. Let alone Bhutan electricity to PAK grid.

    As for India, MFN status opens up PAK market for investments first, and also reduce the cost of food and other products. The slumping Karachi market will get a boost by co-listing in BSE.

    I see both India and PAK trading with each other in their respective currencies soon. This is a better option for PAK.

    Next five years are important to watch. If it does not happen by then, then PAK will be in a difficult position. Recommend

  • Rakib
    Apr 26, 2011 - 8:47PM

    @Meekal Ahmed:

    Your point is valid but for all you know Indians may not smother anybody but provide substitutes for the far more expensive products/raw materials that Pakistan is already importing from some other country spending extra time and money on logistics.

    In general:

    Obsession with MFN and with BoP being always favourable to one’s own country should be given up. Indo-China trade is loaded heavily in China’s favour but India is a beneficiary by sourcing what it needs from a cheaper supplier instead of getting it from Europe or US. Look at an opportunity area: Pakistan makes cement of good quality at competitive price. Question India must ask itself would be whether it makes sense to import Pakistan cement considering the massive requirements of infrastructure projects that its domestic industry can not cope with. And question Pakistan should raise is does it make sense to import such pharmaceuticals and specific bulk chemicals from India that Pakistan does not produce and which can make drugs cheaper for patients in Pakistan. And then take a business decision based on the answers. Only question both countries should ask themselves should be: can trade between the two countries make any produce cheaper for the much harried middle class among the SAARC countries in this era of galloping inflation.

    Experience has taught that end of the day a humble onion for which tears were shed not long ago is far more important than worthless ego of Internet warriors.Recommend

  • Hedgefunder
    Apr 27, 2011 - 12:17AM

    @John:
    John, oops!! I just spilled my holy water !!!!
    One knows, that this can be good deal all around, but can they be trusted to maintain the terms and conditions and respect the contracts too!!!
    There are those with right wing views, on both sides who would want to stop this!
    In regards to trading in local currencies, I am sorry i simply would not agree, I rather like the chinese deal in euros or dollars!
    By the way, I have just finished Abu Fazl@ volumes, very interesting but took time to get use to the english that is translated. I have stored the site for further reading too.Once again many thanks for that.
    I have a recomendations for you too, a book by Nandan Nilekani, Imagining India and another one by Parag Khanna, The Second World.
    Both are good reading.Recommend

More in Pakistan