Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Bhutan join India in withdrawing from SAARC summit in Pakistan

Saarc summit cannot take place even if only one of the eight members withdraws


Afp September 28, 2016
PHOTO: AFP

DHAKA: Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Bhutan on Wednesday pulled out of a regional summit of South Asian leaders in Pakistan, a day after India said it would boycott the event over a deadly attack on a military base.

India blames Pakistan for the assault in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir earlier this month that has heightened fears of a new conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours.

Tensions rose further on Tuesday as India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi cancelled the trip, and Islamabad warned it would treat it as "an act of war" if India revoked a water treaty.

India pulls out of SAARC summit in Islamabad

The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc) summit cannot take place even if only one of the eight members withdraws.

Bangladesh on Wednesday said it has communicated its inability to attend the summit to current SAARC chair, Nepal. The Bangladeshi High Commissioner to India, Syed Muazzem, said current circumstances were "not conducive to producing concrete and satisfactory results."

In separate statements, Kabul and Thimpu also announced their decision to withdraw.

Pakistan's foreign ministry called India's move "unfortunate" and said it remained committed to peace and regional cooperation. In a statement, it accused India of meddling in Pakistan's internal matters.

India's decision to cancel the trip is the latest attempt by India to try to pressure Pakistan diplomatically. India has said it will respond to the Kashmir attack but experts say it is short of military options because of the risk of escalation.

SAARC anti-corruption forum: NAB chief calls for corruption-free South Asia

"The signal cannot be sent that we are rewarding Pakistani bad behaviour by allowing our prime minister to go to their country even for a multilateral meeting," said an India Congress Party leader, Shashi Tharoor, standing by the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s decision.

India on Monday  began a campaign to isolate Pakistan at the United Nations, and Modi told officials India should exploit more of the water from three rivers that flow into its neighbour, potentially cutting water levels downstream.

"It's part of a larger policy of isolation of Pakistan," said India's former foreign secretary, Lalit Man Singh. "India has done that internationally by raising the issue of Pakistan and its links with terrorism at the U.N., at the G20, at the BRICS Summit."

India says Pakistani militants sneaked across the de facto border that separates the countries and killed 18 soldiers on September 18, the biggest loss of life for Indian security forces in the region for 14 years.

Pakistan rejects the accusation and says India should conduct a proper investigation before it apportions blame.

Indian and Pakistani mistrust has long undermined South Asian regional cooperation and is widely blamed for the poor performance of SAARC, which successive Indian leaders hoped would help South Asia become a viable economic counterweight to China.

Divided between India and Pakistan since 1947, the nuclear flashpoint of Kashmir lies at the heart of the countries' rivalry. India also faces an insurgency against its rule in the portion it controls, its only Muslim-majority state.

COMMENTS (49)

Trollslayer | 7 years ago | Reply @ Sheraz Pakistan has been a vassal state of the US since its inception. Air bases in Peshawar were being used by the US in the early 50s to spy on USSR, your COAS gets his orders from Central Command in Tampa, Florida. You are a bunch of brown sahibs whose mental landscapes are still colonized by all and sundry. A colonized people shouldn't talk, period. @ Ch. Allah Daad Best post, thus far.
Ahmed Ali khan | 7 years ago | Reply @TM: you are worrying about $2 billion. Raul Klasara was quoting world bank figures of transfer of $14 billion dollars to India from Pakistan. Raul klasara was asking state bank to let us know who sent that amount during 2013-2016.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ