India, Pakistan could skid into nuclear war, top expert warns

It could happen, and it would be catastrophic for both countries, expert says


News Desk September 23, 2016
PHOTO: THE GUARDIAN

Growing tensions between India and Pakistan could send the neighbouring countries skidding into a nuclear war, a prominent political scientist has warned.

“It could happen, and it would be catastrophic for both countries,” Shooting for a Century: The India-Pakistan Conundrum author Stephen P. Cohen said. Tensions reached boiling point over the weekend when militants attacked an army base in the Uri area near the Line of Control on Sunday morning, leaving 18 soldiers dead.

Uri aftermath: India whips up war hysteria

A report published by New York Times  stated that the escalating tension presented a challenge to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi who has vowed to bring about an economic revival in the country which could only be attained through regional peace.

The report went on to quote former Indian-held Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah remarking that things in Kashmir had remained relatively calm since 2010. This, Abdullah said, made the Indian government believe that the turbulent days of the past were over.

India summons Pak envoy over Uri attack

The report also pointed to "warning signs" pertaining to rising unrest among young people in the region over the last two years. The killing of 22-year-old Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani by Indian forces in early July served as one such instance, sparking protests across the region.

“Wani should have served as an alarm bell for the government system,” The Wire editor Siddharth Varadarajan said“Why would a young man, instead of taking up engineering, adopt a course that any reasonable person would tell him would end up in death?” he said.

Separately, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Wednesday made a strong case for Kashmir during his address at the 71st United Nations General Assembly session. "Peace and normalisation between Pakistan and India can’t be achieved without the solution of Kashmir," he said. "We should resolve our differences in Jammu and Kashmir. Talks are in the interest of both the countries,” Sharif added.

‘India will not attack Pakistan or AJK’

Ahead of the UN General Assembly session, the primer minister and Army chief General Raheel Sharif discussed different options in the apparent backdrop of ongoing hostility with India. Going a step further on Thursday, the Indian army moved heavy artillery to forward bases along the 778-kilometre Line of Control (LoC) in Kashmir.

This article originally appeared on The New York Times, a partner of The Express Tribune.

 

COMMENTS (22)

Deepak | 7 years ago | Reply IT was Pakistan who refused to implement the plebiscite until India accedes to it and continued holding on to the portion of Kashmir under its control.This was the primary condition for holding a plebiscite which was of Pakistani tribal and fighters vacating POK as pre-requisite for the plebiscite and when this did not happen, the UN resolution became invalid and failed to materialize So since the old resolution is no longer valid, if the plebiscite was to take place again, it would happen only if both countries go the UN with a fresh set of proposals on plebiscite
Aqeel | 7 years ago | Reply India doesn't allow UN observers to visit Kashmir and India has never conducted a referendum which was also mentioned in UN resolution on Kashmir and also thousands of innocent Muslims have been killed. So you better not talk about UN resolution and human rights and if you say that Pakistanis are taught about a fake past then let me assure you that Kashmir unrest 2016 is not past
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ