Indian journalist asked to leave foreign secretary's news conference in New York

No Indian reporters were allegedly allowed to attend the press briefing


News Desk September 20, 2016
Pakistan's Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhary. PHOTO: FILE

An Indian television journalist was allegedly shown the door during Pakistan Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry's news briefing in New York on Monday, NDTV reported.

Someone at the press conference in Roosevelt Hotel is reported to have said, "Iss Indian ko nikalo [remove this Indian]." Further, no other Indian journalist was allowed to attend the briefing on the sidelines of the UNGA, the news channel reported.

IoK base attackers carried made-in-Pakistan products: Indian media

The incident is the latest of a series of events signifying deteriorating relations between India and Pakistan in the aftermath of Sunday's attack on the army base camp in Indian-occupied Kashmir which claimed the lives of 18 soldiers.

India believes its nuclear-armed neighbour is responsible for orchestrating the attack and claims it has found evidence linking the attack to Pakistan Army. Indian Army officials said, "We have uncovered GPS trackers that show the attackers' starting points in Pakistan, and arms marked with the insignia of the Pakistan Army."

Furthermore, India has also decided to diplomatically isolate Pakistan as an immediate measure following the attack on Uri military base in Indian Kashmir. India’s civil and military leaders squarely blame a Pakistan based militant group Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) for the attack.

India has long accused Pakistan of supporting attacks in occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which they both claim in full but rule only in part. Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently raised the stakes by expressing support for separatists within Pakistan.

Pakistan denies any role in cross-border terrorism, and has called on the United Nations and the international community to investigate atrocities it alleges have been committed by the security forces in Indian-ruled Kashmir. Relations between the nuclear-armed neighbors have been on edge since a New-Year attack on an Indian air force base in Punjab, near the border with Pakistan, that killed seven uniformed men.

Kashmir has been divided between India and Pakistan since the two gained independence from British rule in 1947. Both claim the Himalayan territory in full.

Indian-held Kashmir has been in the grip of widespread protests against Indian rule for more than two months, sparked by the killing of a popular rebel leader in a gun battle with soldiers on July 8. At least 87 civilians have been killed and thousands injured in the deadly protests and clashes, the worst violence to hit the region since 2010.

PM Nawaz leaves for New York to attend UNGA session

Several rebel groups have for decades fought Indian soldiers – currently numbering around 500,000 – deployed in the territory, demanding independence for the region or its merger with Pakistan. Tens of thousands of people, mostly civilians, have died in the fighting.

COMMENTS (28)

GauMutra | 7 years ago | Reply @genesis: Even a greater news for all you Indians. Over 2 million toilets have been built in India since Modi took over the government and 2 billion toilets more to go. You can build 2 billion more toilets but building toilets and using them are 2 different things. Hindus love their freedom of secretion as much as freedom of expression I guess.....
genesis | 7 years ago | Reply @Abdul Jabbar: SAARC was dead from the day he ideas was born.It is be dismantled and shut down.There are better ways to improve the economy of this region with or without Pakistan,India is a big market and many countries are interested and will benefit.Even China will change course.After all it is the economy as they say and money talks.right now India is the biggest market for china.mobile phones.how many markets are left of the size of India.and with money to buy......
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ