- 01 Dec 2010
Standing up to corruption - 12 Jan 2011
Whither tolerance? - 02 Feb 2011
Dare to dream - 04 Jan 2011
Parliamentary reform
The writer is a PML-Q MNA [email protected]
We take for granted that certain corrupt practices and injustices are ingrained in our system and will never be eliminated, so we let them be. As a nation, we all witness or hear about many injustices through our media, but we don’t react strongly enough. A few of us react, but that reaction is so little and so late that the systemic faults remain.
Society as a whole does not react. If it were to react with enough pressure, the issue would not only be resolved immediately but would also not occur again. Vibrant societies keep their governments on track. They do not wait for ineffective parliaments to continue debating issues indefinitely. Vibrant societies keep a check on the parliament and the executive by forcing them to fix issues. They realise that relying on a parliament that plays by the elitist standards of ‘you cover my corruption and I will cover yours’, is not the way forward.
There is a lot of talk of looking at the Middle East, and how the people there have awoken. The issue in Pakistan is that we are told we have a functional parliamentary democracy and thus the Middle Eastern awakening won’t happen here. There is a false sense of hope that, since parliament exists, there is space to let the steam off. Whilst this is technically true, it is, in fact, very misleading. A parliament which protects the interests of the corrupt across political parties cannot give justice.
What will it take for people to come out on the roads? In January, when I stood with lady health workers outside the Governor House in Karachi, I saw 300 women fighting for their rights, accompanied by the faithful Pakistani media. As I sat with them, I thought about how they served their country, but when their salaries were not paid, nobody showed up in their support. Had the people of Karachi joined these workers, their issue could have been resolved.
The conclusion is that in Pakistan only the directly affected come out on the streets. Were civil society to join them, and share their pain, their struggle would be far more productive.
I have taken part in a lot of protests in my three years in politics. They have been painfully slow at getting the desired results. I often reflect on the small number of people who turned up at these protests. Even in the long march from Quetta to Islamabad, which was meant to address the issue of government employees emoluments, only a fraction of the affected people showed up to protest.
Why doesn’t a greater majority turn up to protest on the streets? Perhaps because we have become used to living in the midst of injustice. Perhaps because we have become used to our fate not changing. We need to believe that a fellow Pakistani’s pain is our pain and we need to react jointly. Only unity gets results. What will it take for you to react? When injustice strikes at your own doorstep?
Published in The Express Tribune, February 9th, 2011.
More in Opinion
Sovereignty over servitude — I
When I did this and when I did that! The liberal use of the first person to glorify your persona reads as if you are in campaign mode. Can you please actually do something rather than state the obvious. Recommend
In 64 years of our countries life the 2% who have it all have built a system by which the other 98% have to look to them for betterment or change. The thought process behind this is akin to the relationship of the feudal with the surf. The other alternate subtly injected into this 98% is to wait for divine intervention.
To change the system one must have free elections every three years (like Australia – I think) and let the people decide. This will work as a filter to weed out the chaff.
Of course if we could buy a Lee Kuan Yue from the Sunday bazaar and install him in Islamabad that would do even better.Recommend
Protests do not get you anywhere. Its also un-Islamic to vent your anger through protests. Reason and logic are more useful.Recommend
I am not going to answer the question. You never answer mine.Recommend
Did you come out to protest against the murder of Salman Taseer? I guess you are among those who are not directly affected.Recommend
I seriously want to understand that “what do you mean by Civil Society”?? A bunch of rich people have lot of time and they want to discuss poor people issue in public as they are fed up of discussing those in their in-house / kitty parties. Can anyone tell me the name of any person of medium / lower medium / lower class of society are the member of the Civil Society. I read somewhere a quotation written by one big Pakistani scholar ” These civil society activists or women welfare activists are those who actually are the second wife of their husband and they send their husband first wife to the villages and become activists for the reason they feel threatened that their husband might get the third wife.
Yesterday I saw his talk show “Capital Talk”. He invited among others Mr. Juctice (r) Javed (spoke-man for the movement for restoration of Chief Justice). The interesting thing in that both Mr. Mir and Justice sb. blaming each other for making the nation violent. After the successful movement against Dictator both the parties blaming each other as they themselves now feel threatened for the violence they lightened in the nation.
Arnt they alongwith Civil Society all responsible for all the violent presence in our society??Recommend
Injustice in a Muslim society? Utterly and absolutely impossible.
Those claiming to be Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindoos, Buddhists etc. or of any other religion are just too many in numbers. Those who prove themselves to be true to their religion through their deeds are just too few.
Coming across anyone to be in the true following of his/her religion as their deeds show, will always and always be a breath of fresh air.
People not displaying “Justice” in their deeds can never be Muslims. Lord Almighty has made doing Justice a matter of the highest priority for anyone who wants to be accepted as a Muslim by the Lord. No Muslim will ever leave doing Justce to be the sole responsibility of the Chief Justice.
Doing Justice is to regard and respect the Lord Creator exactly as He is i.e. Lord Creator, Lord of the worlds.
Doing Justice is to regard and respect every human soul exactly as one is i.e. a human soul.
On that terrible terrible day, i.e. the day of Judgement overwhelming majority of the humankind will get the rudest shock. Naturally among them will be many of us who somehow believed they were Muslism. Muslims just beccause they claimed to be so.
Anyone and everyone who believes in that terrible day coming their way will naturally show their belief through their good deeds for the fellow humankind.Recommend
‘you cover my corruption and I will cover yours’…alas! ur party’s future leader/Q’s successor is on a run ‘n’ here your are relating stories of ideal societies….sorry state of affairsRecommend
Ms. Memon, the civil society elected leaders like you to begin with. In case you are unfamiliar with politics, this is also called representational democracy. We the people elect people like you to speak for us and express our needs and wants in the parliament. Therefore, it is upon you and your colleagues to have meaningful debates and discussions in pilot. The ‘awam’ aka civil society is already stretched too far, so please don’t pass more responsibilities to them. The real question is where the leaders and our so-called representatives are and not where the civil society is!Recommend