Opposition not serious over Panama leaks probe, only targeting PM: Nisar

The PML-N government expresses willingness for talks with opposition parties over ToRs


News Desk May 04, 2016
An Express News screen grab of interior minister press conference.

Rejecting the opposition’s proposed ToRs to investigate Panama Paper leaks, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar has said the target of opposition parties was Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and not corruption.

“Opposition’s target is not corruption but Nawaz Sharif. They don’t want to get to the truth, and are insulting the prime minister,” the security czar said while addressing a press conference in Islamabad on Wednesday. He was flanked by minister Zahid Hamid.

A massive leak of 11.5 million tax documents on April 3 exposed the secret offshore dealings of world leaders and celebrities, also naming three of the premier’s children for owning London real estate through offshore companies.

According to Radio Pakistan, the PML-N has decided to form a committee to negotiate with the opposition.

Nisar said the prime minister had already showed his sincerity for exposing the truth but the opposition parties were insulting him.

Panama leaks: Opposition parties agree upon ToRs, seek PM family probe first

“What more sincerity you want from the prime minister as he has announced he would go home if proven guilty?” Nisar asked the opposition.

Succumbing to mounting political pressure for a wide inquiry, PM Nawaz on April 22 presented himself and his family up for accountability after requesting the Supreme Court to form a commission to investigate the Panama Papers scandal.

The opposition parties on Tuesday evolved consensus on the ToRs to probe into the foreign wealth of the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s family and others in the backdrop of the Panama Papers leaks.

Blaming Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) for delaying the commission’s work, the interior minister implored the party “not to confuse people and let the truth be exposed”.

Panama leaks probe: Information minister defends judicial commission’s ToRs

“The proposed amendments have created distances between us and the opposition as they are based on mala-fide intentions,” added Hamid.

He said the ToRs given by the parties had already given a conclusion in its preamble, which was against the rules of any ongoing probe.

“Even the ICJ has said Nawaz Sharif's name was not mentioned in the Panama Papers but the opposition parties have given their verdict on the matter."

COMMENTS (12)

Naim Khan | 7 years ago | Reply Interior Minister Ch Nisar doesn't even know ABC of his job, he is trying to explain about Panama Papers? You are trying to say Hussain, Hassan, Murraym, are not PM Nawaz's children? Where did the money come from did three children worked hard in London? No they haven't done days work in their life. Do you know how much property is worth? Millions of Pounds, none of the children could get to better universities. Nawaz shouldn't be a PM of Pakistan, look at the Law and Order situation in Pakistan you shouldn't be a home minister.
Naeem Khan | 7 years ago | Reply Because he is head of the country and I bet if independent investigations are carried out, there will be lead to the Prime Minister House. What NS and his minions are doing is to delay the matter so it will never reach it conclusion. The government side of ToRs is an eye wash and designed to delay and hood wink the nation. If NS is so innocent then why not go for an independent investigation which should include forensic experts to figure out if the PM was engage in money laundering. One should also ask his children who are Pakistani nationals that where did they get those millions and what kind of business they were involved in foreign countries and did they pay fair share of their taxes to Pakistan's treasury. We all know the real answers. Above all how could they even talk of foreign investments in Pakistan when they themselves stashing their wealth abroad.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ